The Associated Press summarizes the decisions handed down by the Supreme Court today. Truthfully, I am only mentioning this to (boastfully) bring up the fact that I was there.
I was hoping they would address this case, but I guess we will have to wait until Monday (...or potentially Thursday).
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
"But how is this legal plunder to be identified? Quite simply. See if the law takes from some persons what belongs to them, and gives it to other persons to whom it does not belong. See if the law benefits one citizen at the expense of another by doing what the citizen himself cannot do without committing a crime."
Frederic Bastiat
Bloggers
Posts
Blogroll
- Agoraphilia
- Asymmetrical Information
- Cafe Hayek
- Carpe Diem
- Confusion's Confessions
- Division of Labour
- EconLog
- Freakonomics
- Greg Mankiw's Blog
- Heroes of Capitalism
- Hit and Run
- Ideas
- Knowledge Problem
- Marginal Revolution
- Organizations and Markets
- Tax Foundation
- Technagora
- The Austrian Economists
- The Perfect Substitute
Archives
-
▼
2008
(168)
-
▼
Jun
(29)
- What is a Picture Worth?
- Tid Bit
- Roadkill Tax
- Speaking of Guns
- DC v. Heller
- What I am Reading
- Fiscal Fact
- Fourty Years of Floods
- Headlines
- 'Nudging' Back
- Cracking Down on Crime Celebrity Tax Evaders
- Liberty in Zimbabwe? Don't Bet On It
- Walter Williams
- What is a Picture Worth?
- What I am Reading
- GAO: Uncle Sam Paying Medical Providers But Not Vi...
- Joke of the Day
- What is a Picture Worth?
- Benchwarmers
- Rent Movie Seeking
- Joke of the Day
- A Brief Review of the Literature for Presidential ...
- Looking Back
- War on Culture
- Read My Lips
- Movie Tax Credits
- What is a Picture Worth?
- Takin' on the Tax Code
- Public Housing
-
▼
Jun
(29)
No comments:
Post a Comment